Archive for September, 2009

Swedish dairy company expresses regret for business deal with Grace Mugabe

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009

DeLaval websiteThe Telegraph newspaper have put a Swedish company under the spotlight, reporting that:

DeLaval, a leading equipment firm based in Sweden, is part of the giant Tetra Laval group owned by the Rausing dynasty which includes some of Britain’s wealthiest people.

It sold a 32-cow-capacity milking parlour, two giant cooling tanks and consumables worth £300,000 to Gushungo Dairy Estate, now controlled by Grace Mugabe.”

A few days ago The Sunday Telegraph broke the news that Nestlé was one of Grace Mugabe’s biggest customers, buying milk from her dairy empire based on farms stolen from commercial farmers. The Swiss government has its own set of targetted sanctions imposed against some of the Zanu PF elite profiteering out of illegal activities, and Grace Mugabe is one of them.

On the Swiss [sanctions] list she is described as “spouse of the head of government and as such engaged in activities that seriously undermine democracy, respect for human rights and the rule of law”.

(more…)

Thoughts on Facebook as a tool for Zim activism

Wednesday, September 30th, 2009

Sokwanele on Facebook

As of late last night, Sokwanele is now officially on Facebook. You can find our Facebook page here.

If you are one of the many people who use Facebook to keep in touch with friends and family around the world, you’ll now also be able to keep up with Sokwanele updates by becoming a ‘Fan’ of Sokwanele. This means you will be able to share news about Zimbabwe and Sokwanele activism campaigns etc directly with all your friends and family via your personal Facebook pages. (If you look to the right there’s a button in our sidebar providing a shortcut to ‘becoming a fan’ via This is Zimbabwe). (more…)

The Legal Monitor – Edition 14

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

The Legal Monitor - Edition 14Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights have emailed out Edition 14 of The Legal Monitor.

Contents:

  • Mass trial for victims of looting
  • Mukoko ruling: justice on trial?
  • Police break up march against brutality
  • Kenyan arrested
  • Fears of fresh abductions as police hunt MDC director
  • Bill Watch: ZEC interviews
  • UK firm wins diamonds ownership case
  • What is a Human Rights Commission?
  • Army defies yet another court order
  • Magistrate to rule on cellphone case
  • Police arrest sect members

We are archiving copies of The Legal Monitor on our website.

Edition 14 can be downloaded from this link here.

Mukoko vindicated at last – ZLHR

Tuesday, September 29th, 2009

ZLHR LogoZLHR Press Release – 28 Nov – Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights (ZLHR) is overjoyed by today’s Constitutional Court ruling in which Jestina Mukoko won a permanent stay of prosecution due to the violation of several of her fundamental rights by state agents.

In handing down the unanimous judgment of the Constitutional Court bench, Chief Justice Godfrey Chidyausiku, sitting with Deputy Chief Justice Malaba, and Justices Sandura, Ziyambi and Garwe, found that Mukoko’s constitutional rights had been violated, and as a result her criminal prosecution had to be permanently stayed.

Mukoko, the Director of the Zimbabwe Peace Project, was the victim of an illegal abduction/enforced disappearance in December 2008, and was subjected to various other human rights violations during her incommunicado detention.

The court held that her fundamental right to be free from torture had been violated by “the State, through its agents”. So too, the court found that State agents had violated her constitutional right to personal liberty and denied her protection of the law. The violations committed had been to such an extent as to warrant a permanent stay of criminal prosecution, and the charges against her in her criminal trial were therefore withdrawn.

ZLHR commends the Constitutional Court bench for its brave and just decision and sincerely hopes that this is a sign of genuine movement towards the restoration of the Rule of Law and the dignity of the justice delivery system in Zimbabwe. Today’s ruling will go a long way in beginning to restore public confidence in the judiciary as an independent institution which can and will protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of all the people of the country, without fear or favour.

The unanimous ruling was the only rightful and foreseeable outcome in light of the overwhelming facts and legal arguments presented in support of Jestina Mukoko’s application.

Many of the violations and much of the wasted time, costs and anguish caused by this malicious prosecution could have been averted had the office of the Attorney General properly advised its clients, namely the police and state security agents, of their unlawful actions and properly performed its constitutional duty to ensure that such violations were punished by a refusal to prosecute. Instead, representatives of this office time and again sought to abuse their functions for the purposes of persecution, rather than justifiable prosecution. ZLHR sincerely hopes that the Attorney General will reflect deeply on how this case was mishandled and ensure that he does not tolerate similar actions by the errant law officers who were involved in this case, or any others, which may arise in the future.

Whilst we celebrate today’s victory with Jestina, we are mindful that 7 other abductees remain unaccounted for to date, and we urge the Attorney General to advise the law enforcement authorities to comply with several court orders for them to investigate these disappearances and inform of the whereabouts, and/or produce Gwenzi Kahiya, Lovemore Machokoto, Charles Muza, Ephraim Mabeka, Edmore Vangirayi, Peter Munyanyi, and Graham Matehwa, which orders they continue to defy with impunity.

Will Zimbabwean state agents be held responsible for violating Mukoko’s rights?

Monday, September 28th, 2009

This via the BBC:

Terrorism charges against a prominent Zimbabwean rights activist have been thrown out after a court ruled she had been tortured while in custody.

The Supreme Court granted Jestina Mukoko a permanent stay of prosecution after she told how security agents took her from her home and beat her.

[...]

Chief Justice Godfrey Chidyausiku dismissed the case against Ms Mukoko and eight other defendants.

He accepted the claims of Ms Mukoko’s lawyers that security agents had not upheld her rights.

The state, through its agents, violated the applicant’s constitutional rights… entitling the applicant a permanent stay of criminal prosecution,” Mr Chidyausiku said.

It’s incredibly good news for Jestina and also for the other abductees facing the same charges.

I am left with a question: if the Supreme Court have acknowledged that Jestina Mukoko was abducted, tortured and had her constitutional rights violated by state agents, will the state agents who carried out these atrocities be publically named and held accountable?

More on the cases and experiences of Jestina Mukoko and other detainees here.

Proposed Changes in the Constitutional Process – via Veritas

Sunday, September 27th, 2009

PRESS RELEASE by Minister of Constitutional and Parliamentary Affairs on Constitution-Making Process, 18th September

On September 10, 2009, I announced that the three Principals to the Interparty Agreement were due to meet to rationalise the constitution making process.

Pursuant to the announcement, the three Principals met at Zimbabwe House yesterday September 17, 2009. In attendance at the meeting was the Vice-President, Honourable Mujuru, Ministers Mnangagwa, Chinamasa, Misihairabwi-Mushonga, Ncube, Mangoma and myself (Matinenga).

The meeting defined the Parliamentary Select Committee described in Article VI of the Interparty Agreement as a special purpose vehicle set up to spearhead the constitution making process. This Committee is not an ordinary Parliamentary Select Committee. Consequently the strict Select Committee Rules do not apply to it. (more…)

Grace Mugabe, her ’stolen’ farm and how she supplies Zimbabwean milk to Nestle food giant

Sunday, September 27th, 2009

The Sunday Telegraph features this shocking story today. Why would disGrace be using an unmarked tanker? Why is her farm enjoying big investment. It makes me feel ill. Shame on Nestlé! I certainly won’t be buying any of their products from now on, and I hope others will boycott them too!

Mr Mugabe, the president of Zimbabwe, his wife and a number of other figures linked to his administration are the subject of European Union and US sanctions as a result of their controversial 29-year rule over the once-prosperous country.

Nestlé, the multinational food company which is the biggest customer of Mrs Mugabe’s dairy farm, is not obliged to comply with those sanctions as its headquarters are in Switzerland, but the country has its own set of measures, including against Mrs Mugabe, among which it “is forbidden to make funds available to persons mentioned, or put them, directly or indirectly, at their disposition”. Nestlé denies that it has violated Swiss law. (more…)

“Land reform is the best thing that could have ever have happened…” : Mugabe on CNN

Friday, September 25th, 2009

Robert Mugabe was interviewed by Christiane Amanpour yesterday and CNN have two clips from the interview on their website. As usual, Mugabe produced some pirceless and incredible quotes. In his interview, Mugabe apparently denied that the country was in economic shambles and claimed that food shortages were exacerbated by sanctions and drought. He said:

“The land reform is the best thing (that) could have ever have happened to an African country … It has to do with national sovereignty.”

Mugabe also denied that he lost the 2008 election and denied that he was responsbile for the violence following the elections:

“You don’t leave power when imperialists dictate that you leave,” he insisted. “There is regime change. Haven’t you heard of (the) regime change program by Britain and the United States that is aimed at getting not just Robert Mugabe out of power but get Robert Mugabe and his party out of power?”

  • Photos

    More at Flickr.